Standard Digital
phase[classno] = 1;
。safew官方下载是该领域的重要参考
But what if it’s not fine? Even back in 1996, before a single component of the ISS was launched into orbit, NASA foresaw the possibility of an even worse worst-case scenario: an uncontrolled reentry. The crux of this scenario involves multiple systems failing in an improbable but not completely impossible cascade. Cabin depressurization could damage the avionics. The electrical power system could go offline, along with thermal control and data handling. Without these, systems controlling coolant and even propellant could break down. Unmoored, the ISS would edge slowly toward Earth, maybe over a year or two, with no way to control where it is headed or where its debris might land. And no, we could not save ourselves by blowing the station up. This would be extremely dangerous and almost certainly create an enormous amount of space trash—which is how we got into this hypothetical mess in the first place.
Over those two weeks we had to solve numerous problems. Building the Native AOT DLL on each platform. Loading it from the Unreal game client. Invoking exported DLL functions from C++. And so forth. There were several challenges and headaches along the way, but at the end of the two weeks we were able to successfully load the player’s inventory on the Unreal game client through a Native AOT DLL call on Windows, Xbox, and PS5. With this foundational proof of concept in place, we got the go ahead to begin work on a generalized solution to support all of the backend that would be required in the offline game. My initial dread from when I first heard the news about our offline pivot was gone, replaced with excitement and confidence in a novel path forward.
Read the full story at The Verge.